On

Small Scale Industries

(July 1978 – December 1999)

Reserve Bank of India

Rural Planning and Credit Department
Central Office
Mumbai

Price: Rs.120/- (Hand Delivery)
         Rs.150/- (By Post)

PUBLISHED BY:
SHRI B. R. VERMA
CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER IN-CHARGE
RURAL PLANNING AND CREDIT DEPARTMENT
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
CENTRAL OFFICE
MUMBAI 400001.

PRINTED BY:
Work Center Offset Printer (I) Pvt. Ltd.
A-2/32, Shah & Nahar Indl. Estate,
S. J. Marg, Lower Parel (W),
Mumbai-400013.

FOREWORD

      The Department publishes the compendium of circulars issued by RBI on priority sector advances including Small Scale Industries every year. However, Number of requests are being received from SSI entrepreneurs and SSI Associations to supply copies of Circulars issued on SSI by the Department. Therefore, a need is felt to consolidate these guidelines on SSIs at one place and to bring out a separate compendium of circulars on SSIs for use of small scale entrepreneurs. This compendium contains the important instructions issued by Reserve Bank of India on SSIs during the period July 1978 to December 199. It is hoped that the compendium would serve as a useful guide for the staff of banks and SSI entrepreneurs/Associations.

      Compilation and editing of the Volume has been done by Smt. P. A. Mangrulkar, Asstt. Manger and Shri R. A. M. Modak, Asstt. General Manger, under the overall guidance of Shri R. M. Joshi, Chief General Manger. Their efforts are commendable.

B. R. Verma
Chief General Manger In-charge
10 March, 2000

RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
RURAL PLANNING & CREDIT DEPARTMENT
CENTRAL OFFICE
MUMBAI-400001.

July 20, 1978
Asadha 29, 1900(s)

All Scheduled Commercial Banks

Dear Sir

Report of the High Powered Committee for Examining
Bank Credit Problems of Small Scale Industries

      The Government of India had constituted a High Powered Committee under the Chairmanship of Shri I.C. Puri, Development Commissioner, Small Scale Industries,New Delhi, for examining bank credit problems of small scale industries. The committee has gone into the relevant aspects and has submitted its Report. The recommendations made by it are reproduced in the Annexure. Some of the recommendations have been examined and we advise as under :-

2.  

1.    With a view to introducing a measure of uniformity and simplicity, the committee has evolved two sets of application and interview-cum-appraisal forms for small scale industrial borrowers whose requirements of credit facilities do not exceed Rs.2 lakhs. One set of these forms is for advances upto Rs.25,000/- and another for advances between Rs.25000/- and Rs.2 lakhs. We commend these simplified forms for adoption by banks as early as possible. The formats have been given as Annexure I and I-A to the Report of the Working Group on co-ordination between State Financial Corporation and banks (vide our letter DBOD. No. CAS. BC. 88/C.446(SFC)-78 dated the 8^th July 1978).

2.    Banks should adopt a flexible approach towards margin requirements, particularly in regard to smaller of the small scale industries and the technically qualified and other entrepreneurs sponsored under special employment schemes of Central/State Governments and no viable schemes should be turned down merely for want of margins, if the proposal is otherwise in order. Further, in deserving cases, the entrepreneurs may be permitted to introduce equity contribution in stages, as and when required, without insisting that the entire equity should be brought in at the initial stage of the project itself. However, the source of additional funds required to meet margins for operating at a level beyond the breakeven level should be identified to the satisfaction of the banks at the outset itself.

3.    Banks should be largely guided by the viability of the projects while entertaining credit proposals. Collateral security by way of immovable properties or third party guarantees should not be insisted upon as a matter of routine. No worthwhile proposal should be turned down merely for want of collateral security/guarantee. Where collateral security is obtained, the creation of the charge may be, as far as possible, by way of equitable mortgage instead of registered mortgage to save stamp/registration costs to the borrowers.

4.    Banks should fix repayment programmes in respect of term loans after taking into consideration the surplus generating capacity of the unit financed, the break even point, etc. and not in an ad hoc manner. Besides, the repayment schedules fixed should be reviewed and rescheduled to the extent necessary whenever an industrial unit is unable to make payment due to power cuts, recession or other genuine reasons. Banks should collect the interest accrued on loans during the holiday period in easy installments after the unit starts generating surplus, without any incidence of compound interest.

5.    With a view to facilitating timely sanction of credit facilities, the branch managers should be vested with adequate discretionary powers for ensuring that 60 to 80 per cent of the credit decisions are taken at the branch level itself. The intention is that small credit limits upto Rs.25,000/- and those exceeding this amount but upto Rs.2 lakhs should normally be disposed of within a period of 4 weeks and 8 to 9 weeks respectively from the date of receipt of the applications. Banks should, therefore, make a review of the discretionary powers of officials at various levels. The delegation of adequate authority should, of course, be with due regard to the experience and capabilities of the branch managers and there should be proper system of control over the exercise of such discretion by the branch managers.

3. We shall be glad if you will take immediate steps to implement the aforesaid recommendations of the committee and give suitable operating instructions to all your offices.

4. The other recommendations or the committee are being examined by us/Government of India.

5. Please acknowledge receipt and keep us informed of the steps taken in the matter.

Yours faithfully

Sd/-
(K. B. Chore)
Additional Chief Officer

ANNEXURE

Report of the High Powered Committee for
Examining Bank Credit Problems of Small Scale Industries

SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Standardisation of Application and Appraisal Forms

      The Committee has evolved two sets of application and interview cum-appraisal forms for small scale industrial borrowers whose requirements of credit facilities do not exceed Rs.2 lacs.

Category ‘C’ – for advances upto Rs. 25,000/-

Category ‘B’ – advances between Rs. 25,000/- and Rs. 2 lacs

      The committee recommends that these simplified application and appraisal forms be adopted by all banks, for the sake of uniformity and simplicity.

2. Margins

1. In the case of technically qualified entrepreneurs, the minimum margin requirements should be flexible and no viable schemes should be turned down merely for want of margins, if otherwise in order.

2. For small units requiring financial assistance upto Rs. 25,000/- (Category ‘C’) there should be no insistence on margins; banks should not hesitate to finance upto 100% of their requirements.

3. In respect of the Category ‘B’ units, requiring financial assistance ranging between Rs.25,000/- and Rs.2 lacs, margins should not exceed 20% to 25%.

4. In the case of small industrial units set up under special employment schemes of the Government, banks should not call for additional margins over and above those stipulated by the Government.

5. Entrepreneurs should be permitted to introduce their equity contribution in stages as and when required, without insisting that the entire equity be brought in at the initial stage.

6. The investment subsidy schemes and transport subsidy schemes available to entrepreneurs in backward areas should be given adequate publicity so that they may be fully availed of by entrepreneurs.

3. Collateral Security

1. Banks should give up the security-oriented approach in financing small industries and should depend only on the viability of the project.

2. The practice of obtaining third party guarantees, in a routine manner, especially in the case of small loans, should be discontinued.

3. When a homogeneous group of small borrowers are financed, group guarantees may be obtained to facilitate recovery.

4. Banks should not, normally, insist for collateral security by way of immovable properties or third party guarantees.

5. Unencumbered industrial assets may be obtained as collateral security, without causing hardship to the borrowers by way of additional costs. Such security should also be released from the prior charge whenever legitimate need arises.

6. Banks should not obtain, as a rule, registered mortgages and should accept equitable mortgages where immovable properties are to be charged as security, either primary of collateral.

4. Repayment Programmes

1. Banks should fix repayment programmes taking into account the sustenance requirements, surplus generating capacity, the break-even point and provision for contingencies and not in ‘ad hoc’ manner.

2. Adequate start-up (holiday) period for repayment should be given, taking into account the time taken to reach the break-even point.

3. Interest on loans during the holiday period should be collected in easy installment after the unit starts operating surplus, without any incidence of compound interest.

4. In cases of power-cuts, recession, or natural calamities, the repayment programmes of all loans should be reviewed and rescheduled to the extent necessary.

5. Discretionary Powers

1. Banks should review the discretionary powers of their branch managers and ensure that 60% to 80% of the credit decisions required by the clientele of the branch are taken at the branch level itself.

2. Applications for loans upto Rs.25,000/- (Category ‘C’) should be disposed of, positively, within 4 weeks after receipt. Applications for advances above Rs.25,000/- upto Rs.2 lacs (Category ‘B’) should be disposed of within 8 to 9 weeks.

6. Rate of Interest

1. Banks should adopt a slab system of interest rates, for SSI advances, with a positive bias towards the smaller units.

2. For advances to small units of Category ‘C’ 9advances upto Rs.25,000/-) the interest should not exceed the minimum lending rate prescribed by RBI (at present 12 ½% p.a.)

3. In the case of units with credit facilities between Rs.25,000/- and Rs.2 lacs (Category ‘B’) the rate should be lower than in the higher slabs and, in any case, should not be much higher than the minimum lending rate itself (at present 12.5% p.a.)

4. Banks should avoid charging penal interest rate and wheneer necessary give special concessions in interest rates to sick units under rehabilitation.

5. The concessions in interest rates for units in backward areas, recommended by Nayak Committee should be implemented by the banks.

6. The Committee recommends to the government to exempt interest on advances to small industries from the interest tax, so that the banks may pass on further reduction in interest correspondingly.

7. Banks should not levy service charges, inspection charges, etc. On advances to small scale industries.

8. Banks should, normally, obtain refinance from IDBI for all eligible term loans to pass on the benefit of lower rates of interest. If a bank decides not to obtain refinance, it should, however, pass on the concessionary interest rates on such loans, on its own.

7. IDBI Refinance & Bill Rediscounting Scheme

1. The procedures for obtaining refinance may be further simplified, in respect of term loans upto Rs.5 lacs.

2. All term loans to small scale industries may be made eligible for refinance.

3. The stipulations relating to minimum requirements of debt/equity ratio, promoters etc. may be relaxed in respect of small units.

4. The bills from SSI units may be accepted for rediscount without any specific limit being fixed under Bill Rediscounting Scheme.

8. Measures to be taken to facilitate Flow of Institutional Finance

1. To increase the coverage of financing small industries, banks should make fuller utilisation of SISIs for project evaluation, rehabilitation of sick units, recovery of dues, and marketing assistance. It is recommended that the Government could take steps to upgrade the skills available in the SISIs in the country.

2. To increase the flow of credit to the SSI sector, the entrepreneur should –

1. furnish adequate data to the bank to take credit decisions,

2. give adequate attention to proper planning at all stages and discuss the plans with the bank,

3. maintain basic records, books of accounts, stock registers, etc.,

4. appreciate the need for improving managerial skills, and

5. pay adequate attention to the aspect of quality control.

9. Conclusion

1. The impact of the implementation of these recommendations may be reviewed by a similar Committee after a period of three years.

2. A small Committee under the Chairmanship of Development Commissioner (SSI) with a few bankers, Reserve Bank of India and a representative of industry be appointed to keep a vigilant watch over the implementation of the report and ironing out any problems.

December 12, 1978
Agrahayana 21, 1900(S)

All commercial Banks

Dear Sir

Bank Credit for Artisans, Village & Cottage Industries and
Small-Scale Industries in the Tiny Sector

      Pursuant to the decision taken at the meeting the Prime Minister had with the Chief Executives of major commercial banks and financial institutions on 8^th October 1978, Government of India set up a Working Group for evolving specific measures for expanding bank credit to small scale and cottage industries, artisans etc., with special reference to District Industries Centres (DICs). The Working Group, which submitted its report recently, has noted that although there has been a considerable increase in the flow of institutional finance to this sector, the orientation has mainly been, so far as term lending and commercial banks were concerned, to the modern small scale industrial units in the urban and semi-urban areas and in the case of co-operatives, principally towards the handloom industry. The thrust of the new industrial policy for this sector was, however, to generate production and employment in the rural areas. The Working Group has accordingly made its recommendations for chanalising institutional credit on an increasing scale to the ‘tiny’ modern small scale industries and the village and household industries which are planned to be developed in the rural areas. Based on the suggestions made by the Working Group for the different sub-sectors under small scale industry, we advise as follows :

1. It has been recognised that this sector has the largest employment potential which can be realised only if several organisational, managerial, financial technical and marketing problems of this sector are resolved in an integrated manner. In providing credit to this sector, banks are expected to adopt the following measures :

1. It is estimated that the total credit requirements of an individual artisan or a village or cottage unit would not normally exceed Rs.25,000/- inclusive of both equipment finance and working capital. Credit upto Rs.25,000/- to this sub-sector should be sanctioned as a composite term loan, for equipment finance or working capital or both, with repayment period of 7 to 10 years or even more with an initial moratorium period of 12 months to 18 months both for interest and principal, considering the small amount of surpluses which can be expected to be generated and the continuous essential sustenance needs of the borrowers.

2. There should be no insistence on margin for this category. The guarantee cover in respect of these loans is proposed to be enhanced to be enhanced to 90% and as such, banks should not ask for any collateral security/guarantee.

3. The maximum rate of interest that can be charged on these loans will be the ceiling rates for primary lenders prescribed under the IDBI Automatic Refinance Scheme, viz. 9 ½% p.a. in specified backward districts and 11% p.a. in other areas (excluding the cases which would be covered by the Differential Rate of Interest Scheme). irrespective of whether refinance is obtained or not. IDBI is making necessary arrangements to cover such composite loans under its Automatic Refinance Scheme.

4. While sanctioning the ‘limit’ or ‘loan’, the requirements of one operating cycle should be liberally assessed and a contingency of 10 to 20% should be added to this amount in the original sanction itself to be disbursed when required in any unforeseen contingency due to operational bottlenecks or for some consumption requirements. The quantum of finance extended for consumption purposes in individual cases should not exceed the ceiling indicated hereunder :-

1.   General Consumption             Rs. 75/-



2.   Medical Expenses                Rs.250/-


3.   Educational needs                 Rs.100/-


4.   Marriage ceremonies              Rs.250/-


5.   Funerals, births, etc.              Rs. 75/-


6.   Certain religious ceremonies   Rs. 75/-

Provided, however, the aggregated of the consumption finance for two or more purposes should not exceed Rs. 500/- per borrower.

5. The loans sanctioned should be reviewed at periodic intervals (say annually) to assess whether the working capital requirement of the unit has increased either as a result of increased level of operations or increased cost and enhancements in the loans authorised wherever justified.

For the above purposes village and cottage industry will be defined as :

"Artisans (irrespective of location) or small industrial activities (viz. manufacturing, processing, preservation and servicing) in villages and small towns with a population not exceeding 50,000/- involving utilisation of locally available natural resources and/or human skills (where individual credit requirements do not exceed Rs.25,000/-)"

2. Institutional Finance for the ‘Tiny Sector’

In the case of term loans to this sector the ceiling of 11% as already prescribed in Governor’s letter dated 12^th December 1977 will be applicable. In respect of credit limits for working capital for above Rs. 25,000 but upto Rs. 1 lakh granted to this sector, banks may charge interest at a rate not exceeding 12½% p.a. (except for small banks with aggregate demand and time liabilities of less than Rs.25 crores which may charge interest at a rate not exceeding 13½% p.a.)

(Tiny sector includes industrial units located in villages and in towns with population not exceeding 50,000 and in which the original investment in equipment and machinery does not exceed Rs. 1 lakh).

3.       Banks should not charge penal interest in respect of loans and advances to the above two sectors whether for term requirements or for working capital. Immediately on occurrence of the default in the accounts, the concerned branches should, however, take steps with the active co-operation of the DICs to restore the account to health or where this is not found possible, initiate necessary steps for recovery. No further charges should be levied by banks on such units except by way of reimbursement of reasonable out-of-packet expenses where unavoidable, incurred by banks in respect of the relative accounts.

4.       With a view to facilitating timely sanction of credit facilities to the above sectors, it should be ensured that all proposals upto Rs. 1 lakh are disposed of within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of application. For this purpose–

1. All branch managers of banks should be vested with discretionary powers to sanction proposals upto Rs. 25,000/- without reference to any higher authority. Since the objective of setting up the DIC is to decentralise the decision-marking process to the district level especially in regard to the ‘tiny’ sector, the decisions in respect of these advances should also be at the district level at least upto Rs. 25,000/-. If any bank has any immediate difficulty in extending such discretionary powers to all its branches, it should create the necessary administrative machinery at least at the district level, for this purpose.

2. In respect of advances above Rs. 25,000/- and upto Rs. 1 lakh, in order to ensure that the appraisal at both the DIC and the bank (and the SFC where it is involved) is taken up simultaneously, the DIC will forward a copy each of the application (in duplicate) [including the interview form prescribed by High Powered Committee for Examining Bank Credit Problems of Small-Scale Industries for such advances- (Category ‘B’)] to the bank and to SFC, (where necessary). Further, the Manager (Credit) will also have discussions with the Branch Manger of the bank and the SFC, wherever possible during the appraisal stage so that their points also can be taken care of during the first appraisal itself. The DIC, while forwarding the appraisal will make available the inputs of its different functional managers, like Raw Material, Technical and Marketing and not merely that of the Manager (Credit) so as to obviate the necessity of the bank referring it to SISI or Technical Consultancy Organisation or outside consultants. If any proposal is found to be not acceptable by banks or financial institutions, it should be returned to the DICs with the specific reasons for non-acceptance. The DICs would than be expected to rectify the defects or deficiencies so as to make it eligible.

3. All banks should initiate a feedback mechanism to ensure that the time limit fixed for disposal of proposals is adhered to and that applications are not rejected on flimsy grounds. The rejection of applications should be at a level higher than the Branch Manager in every instance.

4. Once a proper appraisal has been submitted by the DIC, banks should not reduce the limit without apprising the DIC of the reasons for reduced sanction.

1. It is not the intention that all such proposals for assistance must necessarily be routed through DICs. In fact, the Branch Mangers should continue to entertain such proposals directly as at present. Regular meetings and discussions between the Officers of the DIC and the banks and SFC represented in the districts as also senior representatives from State’s Industries Department should be held for closer co-ordination among the financial institutions and DIC, at least in the initial period of six months to a year.

2. Please ensure that suitable guidelines are issued to your bank’s offices and that the relative circular reaches them at least within fortnight. We shall be glad if you will kindly advise us of the action taken/proposed to be taken on the above.

3. Please acknowledge receipt.

Yours faithfully

Sd/-
(A.K. Bhuchar)
Chief Officer

December 12, 1978
Agrahayana 21, 1900(S)

All Commercial Banks

Dear Sir

   Please refer to our circular letter DBOD.No.BP.BC.169/C.464(A)-78 dated the 12^th December 1978 regarding bank credit for artisans, village and cottage industries and small-scale industries in the "tiny sector". The Working Group on small-scale industries with special reference to District Industries Centres, has also made recommendations in respect of problems faced by larger small-scale industries as well. Based on these recommendations, we have to advise as follows :

1. When a SSI unit needs term finance from a SFC and working capital from a bank, it often experiences considerable delay in obtaining working capital after term loans are sanctioned. While the Bhide Committee has made comprehensive recommendations in this regard, these have not been either implemented by banks or have not percolated down to the branch level. There is an urgent need to rectify this situation.

2. In sanctioning of the quantum of credit facilities, there is a tendency to cut down the limits on an adhoc basis on the plea that the unit will require the full credit limits only when it goes into full production. There are often delays subsequently for enhancing limits and unit’s operations suffer. The full working capital should, therefore, be sanctioned at the outset obviating the necessity for references to sanctioning authority subsequently.

3. Once the unit goes into operation, temporary additional requirements of finance are often delayed as a result of which operations suffer. If there is any distortion in the operating cycle, e.g. by non-payment of certain bills, etc., the units fail to get prompt assistance. This is often the result of the need to refer such proposals to the controlling authority. In this connection, some of the banks have delegated authority to their branches to exceed the limits sanctioned by a certain percentage in cases of need. Similar procedures are recommended for adoption uniformly by all banks.

4. The Reserve Bank of India has already directed all the commercial banks that term loan to SSI units should not carry a rate of interest exceeding 11% irrespective of whether they avail of the refinance facility from the IDBI or not. As concessionary refinance is available from IDBI for units in specified backward districts, subject to the banks charging a rate of interest not exceeding 9 ½% p.a. banks should ensure that term finance to SSI Units in those areas become available at 9 ½% p.a. If they are eligible for refinance from IDBI, even if refinance is not actually availed of.

5. In the case of large SSI units with working capital limits exceeding Rs. 1 lakh the penal rates charged should be in conformity with the instructions issued by the Reserve Bank of India and especially the following points should be borne in mind:

1. Penal rate should not be applied in a routine manner; it should be used as a deterrent only in extreme cases of financial indiscipline or wilful defaults;

2. The decision to charge penal rate should be taken only at the controlling office, taking into account the overall position. The facts of the case should justify that such a course of action is warranted to discipline the borrower;

3. The penal rate should be applied on the amount of default or irregularity and not on the total outstandings.

6. No further charges should be levied by banks except by way of reimbursement of reasonable out-of pocket expenses, where unavoidable, incurred in respect of the relative accounts.

2. Please ensure that suitable guidelines are issued to your bank’s offices and that the relative circular reaches them at least within a forthnight. We shall be glad if you will kindly advise us of the action taken/proposed to be taken on the above.

3. Please acknowledge receipt.

Yours faithfully

Sd/-
(A. K. Bhuchar)
Chief Officer

June 5, 1979
Jyaistha 15, 1901(S)

All Commercial Banks

Dear Sir,

Bank Credit for Artisans, Village and Cottage Industries and
Small Scale Industries in the Tiny Sector

   Please refer to our circular DBOD. No.BP.BC.169/C.464(A)-78 dated the 12^th December 1978 on the above subject. The maximum rates of interest to be charged in case of advances to units in the ‘tiny’ sector have been indicated in paragraph 3 of the letter. In this connection, we have to clarify that in the case of term loans for not less than three years granted to units in the tiny sector, banks should ensure that the rate of interest charged does not exceed 9 ½% for units in specified backward districts and 11% in other areas. These loans are normally eligible for refinance from Industrial Development Bank of India. However, the rates of interest specified above should be made applicable irrespective of whether or not Industrial Development Bank of India refinance is availed of.

   In our circular referred to above, we have also indicated that in respect of credit limits for working capital for over Rs.25,000/- but upto Rs. 1 lakh granted to units in the tiny sector, banks may charge a maximum rate of interest of 12½% (13½% for small banks). It is expected that normally credit limits below Rs.25,000/- to the tiny sector will be granted in the form of composite term loans and charged interest accordingly. However, in cases where units in the tiny sector require only working capital limits upto Rs.25,000/, banks should ensure that the rate of interest is as low as possible, particularly in the specified backward district, and in any case does not exceed 12½% (13½% for small banks with demand and time liabilities of less than Rs.25 crores).

   For the sake of ready reference, we enclose a chart indicating the ceiling interest rate structure in case of advances to the small-scale industrial sector.

Yours faithfully,

Sd/-
(K. B. Chore)
Additional Chief Officer

Ceiling rates of interest on advances to small scale industries

Category of Borrower		Nature of advance		Maximum rate of interest to be charged p.a.
i)	Artisans village and cottage industries		Composite term loans upto Rs.25,000/-	9½% in specified backward districts 11% in other area
ii)	Tiny Sector	a)	Working Capital limits upto Rs. 1 lakh	12½% (13½% for banks with than Rs.25 crores)
		b)	Term loans for not less than three years	9½% in specified backward districts 11% in other areas
iii)	Other small scale industries		Term loans for not less than three years	9½% in specified backward districts 11% in other areas

The above categories of advances are exempt from the minimum lending rate directive (Currently 12½%). Advances to small scale industries other than the categories specified above upto Rs.2 lakhs and covered under the Credit Guarantee Scheme for small scale industries are also exempt from the minimum lending rate directive.

NOTE :

1. The above ceiling rates should be made applicable irrespective of whether or not refinance is availed of from Industrial Development Bank of India.

2. In the case of advances covered by the Different Rate of Interest Scheme, the rate would continue to be 4% p.a.

January 1, 1980
Pausa 11, 1901(S)

All Scheduled Commercial Banks

Dear Sir,

Small Scale Industries – Requirement of Insurance
against Fire and Other Risks.

   Please refer to our circular DBOD.No.BP.BC.101/C.464(A)-79 dated the 3^rd July 1979 on the above subject. It has since been decided in consultation with the Guarantee Organisation (i.e. Industrial Finance Department) that there is no objection to a bank waiving the reuirements of insurance cover against fire risk for securities taken in respect of its advances for limits upto Rs.25,000/- for the following three types of advances:

1. Composite loans of Rs.25,000/- sanctioned to artisans, village and cottage industries, etc. in terms of our circular DBOD.No.BP.BC.169/C.464(A)-78 dated the 12^th December 1978.

2. All terms loans.

3. All working capital advances where the advances are against non-hazardous goods.

Yours faithfully,

Sd/-
(N. D. Prameswaran)
Deputy Chief Officer

February 6, 1980
Magha 17, 1901(S)

All Scheduled Commercial Banks

Dear Sir,

Advances to Organisations Undertaking Promotional
Activities for Artisans, Village and Cottage Industries

   Please refer to our circular letter DBOD.No.BP.BC.169/C.(A)-78 dated 12^th December 1978 advising banks to adopt several measures designed to increase the flow of bank credit to artisans and village and cottage industries in pursuance of the recommendations of the Working Group on Small Scale Industries With special reference to DICs.

2. As stated in paragraph 2 of the above circular, it has been recognised that the large employment potential of this sector cab be realised only if several organisational, managerial, financial, technical and marketing problems of this sector are resolved in an integrated manner. The Working Group, had, therefore, recommended that institutional credit support should be available to recognized organisations providing inputs, marketing support, technical guidance and other facilities to the decentralised industrial sector viz., artisans, village and cottage industries. The Group had further recommended that these organisations shoud be included in the ‘priority sector’ for the purposes of credit facilities.

3. The above recommendations have been examined and it has been decided that advances granted to organisations, which have been established for the purpose of developing the decentralised sector by the Central and State Government or by recognised promotional and marketing organisations like KVIC, for the purchase and supply of inputs to and/or marketing the output of the artisans, village and cottage industries, should be treated as ‘priority sector’ advances. Typically, the eligible institutions will be State Level Corporations set up exclusively for assisting handlooms, handicrafts and/or sericulture or registered societies promoted by the KVIC, etc. Advances to these institutions for the above specific purposes will have to be segregated from other advances, if any, given to them.

4. It should, however, be clearly noted that this category of advances will not qualify for the exemption from the increase in lending rates given to "advances to the priority sector as specified from time to time" in terms of paragraph 3(1) of our directive DBOD.No.Dir.BC.138/C.96-97 dated the 13^th September 1979. In other words, advances for new limits which may be authorised to such institutions for the aforesaid purposes may carry an appropriate rate of interest as may be determined by the banks, while interest rates on advances against existing limits may be increased in terms of the above directive dated 13^th September 1979.

5. Instructions regarding the manner in which the above advances are to the incorporated in the quarterly return on priority sector advances are being issued separately. We shall be glad if you will kindly let us know the names of the institutions, the existing limits sanctioned to them and the amount outstanding (as on a date), which would qualify on the basis of the guidelines indicated above, for inclusion in the priority sector advances.

6. Please acknowledge reeipt.

Yours faithfully

Sd/-
(K. B. Chore)
Chief Officer

February 14, 1980
Magha 25, 1901(S)

All Scheduled Commercial Banks

Dear Sir

Financial Assistance to Small Scale Industrial Units

   The Confederation of All India Bright Bars Manufacturers, New Delhi have represented to the financial institutions/banks are not extending financial assistance to the existing units for modernisation and renovation purposes. The matter has been examined in detail by the Government and we have been advised that though creation of further capacity is banned, existing units may go in for modernisation by procuring modern machines, etc. This is necessary in order to avoid obsolescence in such industries. However, the modernisation should not be encouraged where it may result in i ncreased production capacity in banned items (in terms of production capacity).

2. We shall, therefore, be glad if your bank will pleases ensure that requests for finance for replacement and renovation of plant and machinery from such small scale industrial units are dealt with, keeping the foregoing considerations in view.

Yours faithfully

Sd/-
(N. D. Parameswaran)
Deputy Chief Officer

February 14, 1980
Magha 25, 1902(S)

All Scheduled Commercial bank
(excluding Regional Rural Bank)

Dear Sir

Revision in the definition of SSIs – Advances by
Scheduled Commercial Banks

   As you are aware, Government have increased the limit of investment in plant and machinery in the case of:

1. tiny units from Rs.1 lakhs to Rs. 2 lakhs;

2. Small – scale units from Rs.10 lakh to Rs.20 lakhs and

3. Ancillaries from Rs.15 lakhs to Rs. 25 lakhs.

2. In this connection, reference may please be made to DBOD. Circular letter No.BP.BC.94/C.469(1)-80 dated August 7, 1980*. In regard to the concession in the rate of interest, so far as the tiny* units are concerned, banks have been advised not to charge more than 13.50% p.a. (14.55% for banks with demand and time liabilities of less than Rs.25 crores) in respect of their working capital limits upto Rs.1 lakh as against the maximum rate of 16.15% p.a. (17.25% for banks with demand and time liabilities of less than Rs.25 crores) for other small-scale industrial units. This concession will now extend to all the tiny units, including those covered under the revised definition with an enhanced limit of Rs.2 lakhs for working capital limits.

3. As regards exemption from the minimum lending rates, advances upto Rs.2 lakhs and covered under the Credit Guarantee Scheme for small-scale industries are at present exempt from the minimum lending rate directive (currently 13.5%). This concession will continue as at present.

4. At present, for working capital advances, the ceiling on the rates of interest for advances to small-scale industries is 16.15% p.a. (17.25% for banks with demand and time liabilities of less than Rs.25 crores) as against the normal ceiling of 19.4% p.a. (20.5% for banks with demand and time liabilities of less than Rs.25 crores). Keeping in view the revised definition of small-scale industries, it has been decided that the present ceilings on interest rates will continue to be applicable for all credit limits to SSI units upto (and inclusive of) Rs. 25 lakhs for working capital purpose. Interest applicable to limits in excess of Rs.25 lakhs will, however, be subject to the normal ceiling of 19.4% p.a.

5. All advances to small-scale units, coming under the new definition, will be treated as ‘priority sector’ advances. However, for the purpose of monitoring the performance in this behalf, banks are advised to maintain and report separately the information regarding the advances to units with investment in plant and machinery above Rs.10 to Rs.20 lakhs (Rs.15 to 25 lakhs in case of ancillaries). The question of having the information regarding the investment in plant and machinery, recorded in the SSI registration letters which are issued by the State Directors of Industries is being separately considered. Pending this, the banks may arrange for the separate classification of the desired information, by ascertaining the position regarding the investment in plant and machinery form the borrowers themselves.

6. The question of amending the Credit Guarantee Scheme for small-scale industries to incorporate the revised definition is under consideration and the banks will be advised in the matter in due course.

Yours faithfully

Sd/-
(N. D. Parameswaran)
Deputy Chief Officer

June 9, 1981
Jyaistha 19, 1903(S)

All Commercial banks

Dear Sir

   Please refer to our circular letter DBOD.No.BP.BC.18/C.464(A)-80 dated 6^th February 1980 regarding institutional credit support to organisations undertaking promotional activities for artisans, village and cottage industries. It has been indicated therein that advances to such organisations are to be treated as priority sector for the purpose of allocation of credit, however, no concessions in the rate of interest and other terms are to be extended to these institutions. We have re-examined the question of interest and it has been decided that such advances may be chared concessional rate of interest at 13.50% p.a., effective from the 1^st July 1981, subject to the following :-

1. Only organisations set up by the Central/State Governments or recognised promotional and marketing organisations primarily engaged in assisting the village and cottage industries and rural artisans will be eligible for the concession.

2. The relative advances are exclusively for the purpose of purchase and supply of inputs to and/or marketing of the outputs of artisans, village and cottage industries. Since the advances extended for the above purposes along would qualify for the concessional interest rate, in case credit limits are sanctioned to these institutions for other trading/manufacturing activities or for building up buffer stocks (which would be at normal rate of interest) it would be necessary for the banks to segregate the former category of advances eligible for concessional finance.

Please acknowledge receipt.

Yours faithfully

Sd/-
(N. D. Parameswaran)
Deputy Chief Officer

September 1, 1982
Bhadra 10, 1904(S)

All Scheduled Commercial Banks

Dear Sir

Small Scale Industries-Extension of Assistance to
Small Scale Service Establishments

   Government have recently decided to extend the scope of the definition of small scale industries to small scale service establishments. This is been done with a view to bringing about greater uniformity in regard to assistance to service-oriented small scale units particularly in the context of increasing self-employment opportunities asrising from the growth of urbanisation and industrialisation. Thus, all service-oriented enterprises would also be eligible to be registered as small scale establishments, provided some minimum investment in fixed assets in plant and machinery is involved in setting up such establishments. These units would typically cover personal or household services required in urban, semi-urban/rural context such as laundry, zeroxing, repair and maintenance of consumer durables, etc. However, purely trading or commercial enterprises will not be qualified to be so recognised. Further, only such service establishments will be covered as are having investment in plant and machinery in each case not exceeding Rs.2 lakhs and are located in rural areas and towns with a population of 1 lakh or less. The units would be entitled to the same concessions and incentives as small scale industries and ancillary industries as per the definition contained in out circular DBOD.No.BP.BC.22/C.494(A)-81 date the 14^th February 1981. A copy of the circular letter No.SSI(1)-12(14)-82 dated the 18^th May 1982 issued in this connection by the Ministry of Industry (Department of Industrial Development), Government of India, New Delhi, is enclosed, for your information.

2. The Matter relating to extension of guarantee cover to these units under small loans (Small Scale Industries) Guarantee Scheme, 1981, has been taken up with Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation and you will be advised further in due course.

3. Advances to small scale service establishments now brought within the purview of small scale industries will be treated as ‘priority sector’ advances. These advances may be included under Section ‘A’ of Part II of the statement of advances to priority sector, a proforma of which was forwarded with our D.O. letter DBOD. No. BP.3607/C.464/C.464(M)-81 dated the 24^th April 1981.

4. We shall be glad if you will please issue suitable instructions to your branches at the earliest under advice to us.

5. Please acknowledge receipt.

Yours faithfully

Sd/-
(B. K. Aggarwal)
Deputy Chief Officer

No.SSI(I)-12(14)/82

Government of India
Ministry of Industry
(Department of Industrial Development)
New Delhi

Dated the 18.5.1982

The Secretary,
Department of Industries,
All States/Union Territories.

Subject :Small Scale Industries-Extension of Assistance to Small Scale Service Establishments

As you are aware, Government is keen on enlarging the scope for self-employment opportunities on as wide a scale as possible, particularly in the small scale and village & cottage sector. As far as the small scale sector industries are concerned, their present definition is based on the Notification dated 16^th February, 1973 issued in terms of Section 29(B) of the Industries (Development & Regulation) Act, which prescribes the appropriate investment ceiling in fixed assets in plant and machinery for small scale units and for ancillaries respectively. It will be noted that small scale units have so far been promoted essentially for providing goods and services relateable to manufacture or processing of services connected thereof. It has been noticed that while a number of service oriented enterprises falling under the definition of small scale units at present in force have been registered as small scale units, there are cases in which such registration has been denied, creating a somewhat anomalous situation.

   Since it is clear that the scope for self-employment opportunities will increasingly form the growth of urbanisation and industrial dispersal and, in order to bring about greater uniformity in regard to assistance to service-oriented small scale units, Government have been pleased to decide that all service-oriented enterprises would also be eligible to be registered as small scale establishment, provided some minimum investment in fixed assets in plant and machinery is involved in setting up such establishments. Such small scale establishments would typically cover personal or household services required in urban, semi-urban/rural contexts such as laundry, zeroxing, repair and maintenance of consumer durables, hatchery, poultry farms etc. While registering such service-oriented units as small scale establishments, care will have to be taken to ensure that no enterprise engaged in a purely trading or commercial activity is included. The test to be applied in registering small service establishments would be the requirement of some minimum investment in fixed assets in plant and machinery and the fact that the unit provides services for personal or household needs to the extent that these remain the dominant activities, the unit may be registered as a small scale establishment.

   Government have further decided that on being so registered, these small scale establishments would be entitled to the same concession and incentives as small scale industries and ancillary industries as per definition contained in the Notification dated 16^th February, 1973. It is clarified that purely trading or enterprises will not so qualify.

   In view of the fact that the investment in fixed assets in plant and machinery required by such small service establishments would not be large and also having regard to the fact that it is necessary to use the extended definition to encourage increasing dispersal of such establishments on as wide a scale as possible, Government have further decided that such small service establishment be registered, subject to a ceiling of investment in fixed assets in plant and machinery in each case not exceeding Rs.2 lakhs and subject further to such establishments being located in rural areas and towns with a population of 100,000 or less.

   In respect of the framework of extension, consultancy and other dispensing service required for such small service establishments, Government have also decided that the Development Commissioner (Small Scale Industries) and associated agencies set up for the promotion of the small scale sector as a whole under the Central Government and, in case of States, the Directors of Industries and the associated promotional agencies at the State level will remain responsible for the promotion and growth of small service establishments, as in the case of small scale industries.

   In so far as the National Small Industries Corporation is concerned, instructions are being issued to the Corporation to extend hire-purchase assistance to small service establishments also. Suitable instructions are being separately issued by the Ministry of Industry in regard to the applicability of the Central Investment Subsidy Scheme to small service establishments also, provided they are located in eligible areas/districts. As regards concessional credit etc., the Department of Banking is being requested to take up the matter with the Reserve Bank of India, IDBI and banks and financial institutions for issue of appropriate instructions in accordance with this decision Government.

Yours faithfully

Sd/-
(S. K. Chakrabarti)
Deputy Secretary to the Govt. of India.

October 14, 1982
Asvina 22, 1904(S)

All Scheduled Commercial Banks

Dear Sir

Bank Credit for Artisans, Village and Cottage Industries and
Small-Scale Industries in the Tiny Sector

   As you are aware, the "Composite Term Loan" Scheme formulated by us vide our circular DBOD.No.BP.BC.169/C.464(A)-78 dated the 12^th December 1978, has been in operation for more than three years. This Scheme is intended to assist the artisans, village and cottage industries located in villages and small towns with a population not exceeding 50,000 involving utilisation of locally available resources and/or human skills. However, on receipt of representations stating that the loans granted by banks under the Scheme had not actually gone to the persons for whom they were intended, we conducted a study on a sample basis covering 130 branches of banks in different States. The Study revealed that only 12 of these branches had granted composite term loans. Some of the branch Mangers were not even aware of the Scheme. The period of loans varied between two and five years without any provision for initial moratorium. Most of the loans were granted against collateral security and in certain cases even third party guarantees were insisted upon. Margins were stipulated between 15% and 30% and the specified concessional rates of interest were not charged. The credit requirements of borrowers were not liberally assessed taking into account the requirements of one operating cycle and contingency of 10% to 20% as also provision for consumption expenses. In case of some of the banks, adequate discretionary powers were not vested in branch Mangers to sanction the loans without reference to higher authorities. Thus, the composite loan scheme has not been implemented by banks in accordance with the instructions issued by us and as such it failed to serve the intended purpose, i.e., to generate production and employment in rural areas and small towns to the extent.

2. Certain difficulties have been expressed by banks in regard to composite term loans, i.e., (i) long repayment period of 7 to 10 years or even more with an initial moratorium of 12 to 18 months both for interest and principal, and (ii) want of specimen of standardized documents to be executed by borrowers.

In this connection, we have to advise as under :

1. The period of repayment of term loans is fixed taking into account the break-even point, surplus-generating capacity of the unit, etc. The artisans and village/cottage industrial units availing of the composite term loans would be able to generate small amounts of surpluses. Besides, taking into account their continuous essential sustenance , the period of repayment of loans will have necessarily to be kept at the above level.

2. The banks can in consultation with their legal advisers finalised the specimen of the documents. Industrial Development Bank of India which provides full refinance in respect of composite term loans under its ‘Refinance of Industrial Loans Scheme has agreed that refinance assistance will be allowed for such loans provided the documents executed evidence the term loan character of the assistance sanctioned.

3. The basic approach towards development of small scale industries as outlined in the Industrial Policy Resolutions and National Plans is to create immediate employment opportunities with relatively less investment and to help in raising levels of earnings and standards of living of a large number of artisans, craftsmen and entrepreneurs. In this context, the composite term loan scheme assumes special importance for extending credit facilities to artisans, village and cottage industries on soft terms with a view to providing them with employment opportunities. It is felt that this Scheme will become popular if banks take liberal view in regard to credit proposals received by them from the aforesaid borrowers. For your ready reference, we give in the Annexure our guidelines on composite term loans as contained in circular dated 12^th December 1978 referred to in paragraph 1 above. We shall be glad if you will please issue suitable instructions to your bank’s offices for grant of composite term loans to artisans, village and cottage industries in accordance with these guidelines. The action taken/proposed to be taken in the matter may please be advised to us at an early date.

4. Please acknowledge receipt and let us know the officer to be contacted in your Central Office for the purpose of monitoring in this regard.

Yours faithfully

Sd/-
(B. K. Aggarwal)
Deputy Chief Officer

ANNEXURE

Guidelines Issued by the Reserve Bank in Regard to Composite Term
Loan as Contained in Circular DBOD.No.BP.BC.169/C.464(A)-78
Dated the 12^th December 1978.

Institutional credit for artisans, village and cottage industries

   It has been recognised that this sector has the largest employment potential which can be realised only if several organisational, managerial, financial, technical and marketing problems of this sector are resolved in an integrated manner. In providing credit to this sector, banks are expected to adopt the following measures :

1. It is estimated that the total credit requirements of an individual artisan or a village or cottage unit would not normally exceed Rs.25,000/- inclusive of both equipment finance and working capital. Credit upto Rs.25,000/- to this sub-sector should be sanctioned as a composite term loan, for equipment finance or working capital or both, with repayment period of 7 to 10 years or even more with an initial moratorium period of 12 months to 18 months both for interest and principal, considering the small amount of surpluses which can be expected to be generated and the continuous essential sustenance needs of the borrowers.

2. There should be no insistence on margin for this category. The guarantee cover in respect of these loans is proposed to be enhanced to 90% and as such banks should not ask for any collateral security/guarantee.

3. The maximum rate of interest that can be charged on these loans will be the ceiling rates for primary lenders prescribed under the Industrial Bank of India (IDBI) Automatic Refinance Scheme, viz., 10.25%* p.a. in specified backward districts and 12.5%* p.a. in other areas (excluding the cases which would be covered by the Differential Rate of Interest Scheme), irrespective of whether refinance is obtained or not. IDBI is making necessary arrangements to cover such composite loans under its Automatic Refinance Scheme.

4. While sanctioning the ‘limit’ or ‘loan’, the requirements of one operating cycle should be liberally assessed and a contingency of 10 to 20% should be added to this amount in the original sanction itself to be disbursed when required in any unforeseen contingency due to operational bottlenecks or for some consumption requirements. The quantum of finance extended for consumption purposes in individual cases should not exceed the ceiling indicated hereunder :


*  Interest rates revised with effect from the 2^nd March 1981

1. General Consumption          Rs. 75/-
   

2. Medical expenses               Rs.250/-
   
3. Educational needs               Rs.100/-
   
4. Marriage ceremonies            Rs.250/-
   
5. Funerals, Births etc.             Rs. 75/-
   
6. Certain religious ceremonies.Rs. 75/-
   

Provided, however, the aggregate of the consumption finance for two or more purposes should not exceed Rs.500/- per borrower.

5. The loans sanctioned should be reviewed at periodical intervals (say annually) to assess whether the working capital requirement of the unit has increased either as a result of increased level of operations or increased cost and enhancements in the loan authorised wherever justified.

   For the above purpose, village and cottage industry will defined as:
   "Artisans (irrespective of location) or small Industrial activities (viz., manufacturing, processing, preservation and servicing) in villages and small towns with a population not exceeding 50,000 involving utilisation of locally available natural resources and/or human skills (where individual credit requirements do not exceed Rs.25,000/-)".

2. Banks should not charge penal interest in respect of composite term loan to the above sector. Immediately on occurrence of the default in the accounts, the concerned branches should, however, take steps with the active co-operation of the DICs to restore the account to health or where this is not found possible, initiate necessary steps for recovery. No further charges should be levied by banks on such units except by way of reimbursement of reasonable out-of pocket expenses, where unavoidable, incurred by banks in respect of the relative accounts.

3. With a view to facilitating timely sanction of credit facilities of the above sectors, it should be ensured that all composite term loan proposals are disposed of within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of application. For this purpose:-

1. All branch managers of banks should be vested with discretionary powers to sanction proposals upto Rs. 25,000/- without reference to any higher authority. Since the objective of setting up the DIC is to decentralise the decision-making process to the district level especially in regard to the ‘tiny’ sector, the decisions in respect of these advances should also be at the district level at least upto Rs. 25,000/-. If any bank has any immediate difficulty in extending such discretionary powers to all its branches, it should create the necessary administrative machinery at least at the district level, for this purpose.

2. All Bank should initiate a feedback mechanism to ensure that the time limit fixed for disposal of proposals is adhered to and that applications are not rejected on flimsy grounds. The rejection of applications should be at a level higher than the Branch Manager in every instance.

3. Once a proper/appraisal has been submitted by the DIC, banks should not reduce the limit without apprising the DIC of the reasons for reduced sanction.

4. It is not the intention that all such proposals for assistance must necessarily be routed through DICs. In fact, the Branch Managers should continue to entertain such proposals directly as at present. Regular meetings and discussions between the Officers of the DIC and the banks and SFC represented in the districts as also senior representatives from State’s Industries Department should be held for closer co-ordination among the financial institutions and DIC, at least in the initial period of six months to a year.

November 13, 1982
Kartika 22, 1904(S)

All Scheduled Commercial Banks

Dear Sir

Bank Credit to KVIC Sector

   The credit requirements of KVIC Sector from financial institutions during the Sixth Plan Period have been estimated at Rs.520 crores. Of this, an amount of Rs.230 crores is proposed to be raised by KVI Sector from financial institutions under its Interest Subsidy Scheme. KVIC had reported to us that the progress in availing of institutional finance during 1980-81 and 1981-82 has been quite low. Our Governor had convened a meeting of the Chairman of KVIC and Chairmen of certain major banks on 10 July 1982 to consider some of the practical problems faced by the KVI Sector in obtaining bank finance for KVI programmes. A summary record of the proceeding of the meeting is enclosed for your information. In the light of the deliberations of the meeting, it has been decided that banks may take action on the lines indicated below:-

1. According to KVIC, in a number of cases, banks had provided credit to the KVIC institutions for smaller amounts than recommended by KVIC in the eligibility certificates issued by it under the Interest Subsidy Scheme. The assessment made by KVIC for the purpose of issuing Interest Subsidy Eligibility Certificates should, by and large, be acceptable to banks, However, to enable the banks to verify the basis on which the assessments have been made and with a view to ensuring uniformity as between different banks, the norms for assessment of credit to KVI sector could be discussed and agreed to at the DCC/SLBC forums.

2. A few banks, only in the public sector, have been extending credit to KVI sector. Other public sector banks as also banks in the private sector may extend credit support to the KVI sector which is extending its helping hand to artisans and other who are otherwise unorganised enabling the latter to get necessary support for their activities. The banking system should do their utmost to support the KVI sector.

3. As the credit proposals of KVI sector are generally for larger limits, the Divisional/Controlling offices of banks may directly entertain proposals and make credit assessments so that delay in sanctioning the credit limits could be avoided. In this context, you may please advise us the details of discretionary powers vested in your Branch Managers and the next higher tier (i.e. Divisional/Regional Manager) for granting advances to the priority sector borrowers.

2. Please acknowledge receipt.

Yours faithfully

Sd/-
(J. R. Prabhu)
Deputy Chief Officer

ANNEXURE

Summary Record of the Proceedings of Governor’s Meeting with
Chairman of KVIC and Chairmen of Banks held on the 10^th July 1982

The meeting was presided over by Dr. I. G. Patel, Governor.

2. Welcoming the participants, Governor mentioned that the meeting was convened to consider some of the practical problems faced by KVIC in obtaining bank finance for its programmes. He requested Shri. Thomas, the Chairman of KVIC, to initiate the discussions. Shr. Thomas stated that Khadi and village industries activities have been given an important place in the Sixth Plan. Budgetary allocations made for the sector would not be sufficient to meet its expanding activities and the KVIC sector would have to look increasingly for finance from the financial institutions especially in the context of KVIC taking up activities in new areas. He pointed out that the progress in availing institutional finance under KVIC’s sponsorship has been slow. Governor observed at this stage that there was no lack of sympathy for the KVIC sector and that finance could be extended by the banks.

3. Shri Thomas referred to some of the problems faced by KVIC institutions in obtaining finance from the banks. He mentioned that in a number of cases banks have provided credit to the institutions for smaller amounts than recommended by KVIC in the eligibility certificates issued by it under Interest Subsidy Scheme. He wanted that banks should accept the recommendations of KVIC on the basis of the assessments made by it. It was stated by some of the banks that the basis on which the assessments were made was not indicated in the certificates. Deputy Governor (Shri. Ghosh) observed that KVI could indicate to banks the details of assessments made and KVIC and banks may sit together to resolve the difference. Shri. Sonalkar, Central Bank of India, suggested that the norms for assessment could be discussed and accepted by the District Consultative Committee through the lead bank. Concluding the discussion on this point Governor observed that by and large the assessments made by KVIC for the purpose of issuing Interest Eligibility Certificates should be acceptable to the banks but the banks have the right to exercise their own judgement in the matter. The norms for assessment could be discussed and agreed to at the District Consultative Committee forums.

4. Shri Thomas mentioned that while Reserve Bank of India had exempted KVIC from the operation of selective credit control, a large number of individual institution sponsored by it have to approach Reserve Bank of India for such exemption. He desired that recognised and Certified KVIC institutions should automatically get exemptions from the operation of selective credit control. Governor agreed to examine the suggestions and said that prima facie he thought the suggestion was reasonable.

5. Shri Thomas observed that in case the individual artisans borrowed the money directly from banks they would be eligible for interest at 4% under the DRI Scheme. Governor pointed out that over 40% of the people lived below the poverty line and in the present situation, all the eligible borrowers could not obviously be granted loans at the differential rate of 4% within the ceiling for DRI loans.

6. Shri Thomas observed that the lending rates adopted by the co-operative banks were different for adopted by nationalised banks for the priority sector. Governor indicated that there is no reason why co-operatives should not charge 13.5% for the KVIC sector. Shri Thorat, Chairman of the Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank Ltd. Agreed that the suggestion should be acceptable.

7. Another point made by Shri Thomas was that the branch managers do not possess adequate discretionary powers and the proposals had to be referred to higher authorities which results in delay. The view expressed and accepted was that as credit proposals were for larger limits. KVIC institutions should directly approach the Divisional/Controlling offices of banks to obviate such delays.

8. Shri Panditrao mentioned that there has been under-finacing the schemes covered by the Employment Guarantee Scheme of the Maharashtra Government. The representative of the Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank mentioned that the whole issue was being examined and the matter would soon be set right.

9. Shri Thomas referred to the credit squeeze and the paucity of resources for KVIC sector. Governor observed that these measures do not affect the KVIC sector.

10. Shri Thomas desired that apart from the nationalised banks, the non-nationalised banks and other credit institutions should also come forward to finance the KVIC sector. It was observed by the Governor that the public sector banks could very well take care of the financial requirements of the KVIC sector but others could also extend assistance, if necessary. It was also mentioned that NABARD would be actively involved in the provision of financial assistance to the KVIC sector.

11. Summing up the discussions, Governor observed that KVIC sector had been doing good work. It has extended its helping hand to artisans who are otherwise unorganised enabling them to get necessary support for their activities. The banking system should do their utmost to support this activity.

December 24, 1982
Pausa 3, 1904(S)

All Commercial Banks

Dear Sir

Financial Assistance for Modernisation Programme of
Small Scale Industrial Units

   We advise that at the fourth meeting of the Inter-Disciplinary Group held on the 21^st January 1982, the matter relating to financial assistance for modernisation programme of small scale industrial units came up for discussion. It was decided at the meeting that the list of industries selected for modernisation by the Ministry of Industry would be circulated to banks for providing financial assistance. You will agree that sickness in small scale industries which have obsolete plant and machinery can be prevented by a process of modernisation. Term loans for modernisation to such units are granted by banks at a concessional rate of interest of 13.5%. The Development Commissioner (SSI) has now furnished to us a list of 20 industries selected for modernisation, a copy of which is enclosed for your information. We shall be glad if you will please circulate this list amongst your all offices/branches with instructions that need-based credit facilities for modernisation of these industries may be provided by them keeping in view the guidelines contained in circular ICD.No.CAD.19/C.446(J)-82 dated 4^th March 1982, issued by our Industrial Credit Department.

2. Please acknowledge receipt.

Yours faithfully

Sd/-
(B. K. Aggarwal)
Deputy Chief Officer

Industries selected for modernisation during the year 1976-77

1. Machine Tools

2. Automobile Components & Accessories

3. Castings

4. Domestic Electrical Appliances

5. Hosiery & Knitwears

6. Bicycle & Bicycle parts

7. Hand Tools

8. Leather & Leather Goods

9. Scientific Instruments

10. Storage Batteries & Components.

Industries Selected for modernisation during the year 1977-78

11. Steel furniture

12. Plastic Mouldings & Extrusions

13. Agricultural implements including Tools

14. Readymade Garments

15. Domestic Utensils

16. Wires & Cables

17. Industrial Fasteners

18. Paints, Varnishes & Enamels

19. Packaging Industry

20. Builders Hardware.

April 20, 1983
Chaitra 30, 1905(S)

All Scheduled Commercial Banks

Dear Sir

Small Scale Industries-Extension of Assistance to
Small Scale Service Establishments

   In continuation of our circular RPCD.No.PS.BC. 1/C.464(A)-82 dated the 1^st September 1982, we advise that Government have since liberalised the scope of extension of assistance to small scale service establishments by extending it further to rural areas and towns with a population of 5 lakhs or less. The ceiling on investment in plant and machinery will, however, remain the same, viz., Rs.2 lakhs. A copy of circular letter No. SSI(1)-12(14)/82 dated the 18^th December 1982 issued by the Ministry of Industry (Department of Industrial Development), Government of India, New Delhi in this regard is enclosed for your information.

2. It has also been clarified by Government that the service-oriented enterprises would be eligible to be registered as small scale establishments and on being so registered they would be entitled to the same concessions and incentives as are available to small scale and ancillary industries.

3. We shall be glad if you will please issue suitable instructions to your branches at the earliest under advice to us.

4. Please acknowledge receipt.

Yours faithfully

Sd/-
(B. K. Aggarwal)
Deputy Chief Officer

No. SSI(I)-12(14)/82

Government of India
Ministry of Industry
(Department of Industrial Development)
New Delhi

Dated 18^th December 1982

The Secretary,
Department of Industries,
All States/Union Territories.

Subject :  Small Scale Industries-Extension of Assistance to
Small Scale Service establishments.

Sir,

   I am directed to refer to this Ministry’s Letter No. SSI(I)-12(14)/82 dated the 18^th May, 1982 on the above mentioned subject and to state that it has been decided to liberalise the scope of extension of assistance to small scale service establishments by extending it further to rural areas and towns with a population of 5 lakhs or less. The ceiling on investment in plant and machinery will remain the same, viz Rs.2 lakhs.

Yours faithfully,

Sd/-
(S. K. Chakrabarti)
Deputy Secretary to the
Government of India

June 16, 1983
Vaisakha 26, 1905(S)

All Scheduled Commercial Banks

Dear Sir

Registration of Small Scale and Ancillary Units
Set up by Medium and Large Scale Undertakings

   As you are aware, according to existing instructions, small scale and ancillary units, which have been subsidiary of or owned or controlled by medium and large scale undertakings, are allowed to get themselves registered with the State Directorate of Industries provided they have a separate entity, but they are not entitled to avail of any of the special assistance as is available to the small scale units. Now with the addition of a proviso to the definition of small scale and ancillary industries, such industries which are subsidiary of or owned or controlled by medium and large scale undertakings have been taken out of the purview of the definition of small scale and ancillary industries and they are not to be considered for registration in the small scale sector. We enclose for your information a copy of circular No. 5(1)/82 SSI Bd dated the 26^th February 1983 issued by the Development Commissioner (SSI), Ministry of Industry, Government of India, New Delhi in this regard. You may please arrange to bring to the notice of your branches the contents of this circular.

Please acknowledge receipt.

Yours faithfully

Sd/-
(B. K. Aggarwal)
Deputy Chief Officer

No.5(1)82-SSI Bd

Government of India
Ministry of Industry
Office of the Development Commissioner
(Small Scale Industries)
7^th Floor, Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi

26^th Feb’ 1983

The Commissioner/Directors of Industries,
All States and Union Territories.

 Subject :  Registration of Small Scale and Ancillary Units
Set up by Medium and Large Scale Undertakings.

Sir,

   As you are aware hitherto the registration of small scale and ancillary units which have been subsidiary of or owned or controlled by medium and large scale undertakings was governed by the instructions contained in the Ministry of Industrial Development and Company Affairs (Dept. of Industrial Development) Circular letter No.SSI-A-18(15)/67 dated 5^th December 1968. According to the instructions contained in the said letter such units were allowed to get themselves registered with the State Directorate of Industries provided they had a separate legal entity, but they were not entitled to avail of any of the special assistance as available to the small scale units and enumerated in the said circular.

   Now with the addition of a proviso to the revised definition of small scale and ancillary industries, the small scale and ancillary industries which are subsidiary of or owned or controlled by medium and large scale undertakings have been taken out of the purview of definition of small scale and ancillary industries, and are not to be considered for registration in small scale sector. In turn they have to obtain a COB licence or get themselves registered with DGID or other concerned technical authorities.

   In view of the above you are, therefore, requested to see that the small scale and ancillary industries which are subsidiary of or owned or controlled by medium and large scale undertakings are not to be registered at all as small scale industries. If a unit already registered is found to be a subsidiary of owned or controlled by a medium or large scale undertakings may be deregistered forthwith.

Please acknowledge the receipt of this letter.

Yours faithfully

Sd/-
(J. D. Varma)
Director (SSI Board)
For Development Commissioner (SSI)